Pension advice at the bank – how much does it cost and to whom? The savers’ pension portfolio is usually managed by an insurance agent. When pension counseling is conducted at the Bank, the pension portfolio actually goes to the bank.
Thus, the commissions received currently through the insurance broker from your insurance companies and pension funds are transferred to the bank, and his income from the this article is founded on this.
It was recently published the average annual income of the Bank from each pension counseling client is NIS 900, an amount that through the years can accumulate to tens of thousands of shekels, and also the numbers increase as the customer’s pension savings are greater.
This is a numerical illustration of the price that lies behind “free bank advice”: A pension fund member using a fixed monthly premium of NIS 2,000 per month (according to a monthly salary of NIS 10,000) is expected to pay for the lender from the age of 30 to age 67 a commission of approx. NIS 95 thousand.
Pension advice on the bank – what else is important to learn? The Financial Institution cannot establish any exposure to the business and manage the pension portfolio for the individual employee, as opposed to the insurance broker. Consequently, there is absolutely no exploitation of economies of scale for the employer and the employee, as well as the employer actually added another “insurance professional” to himself, who is the bank’s pension advisor.
This addition only burdens operational and complicates the collection report. For this reason banking institutions currently operate in a relatively small market share, handling almost no managers insurance coverage or other insurance policies, and many with their clients are self-employed.
Therefore, customers who have an interest in objective , professional and low-cost pension counseling should consult an independent pension counselor who collects a one-off fee for that consultant himself, and fails to receive any commissions through the investment houses and also the insurance companies.
Since January 2008, there exists a mandatory deposit for many employees, starting from the end of three months of employment or half a year of employment, depending on whether the employee has a pension plan or has reached an employer with no pension savings.
In the event the employee has pension savings, then your employer will deposit the very first option retroactively, and if the employee is employed right at the end of the year, then by December 31 of that year, whichever is earlier.
This example leaves the business and employee relatively short time to act on the matter. I have often heard of many employees who did not report for the employer that they had a pension plan despite 90 days right from the start in the employment, or knew that they had but did not know who the pension manufacturer was and failed to make a decision on svejpi identity from the pension producer.
In addition, employees with complex plans which have not even agreed with the insurance broker as well as met with him, but have not decided on the mixture of their pension portfolio, have previously reached 90 days through the date of employment, but the employer does not know where to deposit.
So that you can address this challenge, default agreements were signed by the employer with one or another pension manufacturer. Many employers, especially those with high turnover and turnover, used default agreements so that you can transmit lists of workers who had not yet received a choice regarding the identity in the pensionary manufacturer, thereby complying with all the provisions in the extension order for compulsory pension.
These agreements, insofar as they were performed with the assistance of a specialist entity, were along with a service specification, to be able that this employees receive good quality service, both in the accessibility of the marketers as well as in the professionalism in the pension marketing meetings that took place each case right after the joining.